Anti-Newsom critics have successfully collected enough ballots to force the California Democrat into a recall election this year. His numerous failures stemming from his COVID response, to wildfire maintenance have rallied Republicans an Democrats alike to take bold action to remove Newsom.
It was announced on Wednesday by CA Secretary of State Shirley N. Weber that only 43 signatures had been withdrawn from the statewide petition calling for Newsom’s recall. Now over 1.7 million legitimate signatures remain on the petition, surpassing the threshold to initiate a recall election in California.
Newsom handling of the coronavirus pandemic, the hypocrisy in breaking his own lockdown rules, the increasing homeless population, high taxes, and the reputation of being the “least free state in the nation” have contributed to the backlash against the California Democrat.
His recall will be only the second time in California’s history that a governor received such backlash to initiate such bold action to remove him from office. In 2003, Governor Gary Davis was removed and replaced by Hollywood actor Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Weber sent a letter to Department of Finance Director Keely Martin Bosler informing her that the recall election had officially been triggered.
“The Department of Finance, in consultation with county elections officials and the Secretary of State, must estimate the costs of the recall election and submit the estimate to the Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, and the Chairperson of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by August 5, 2021,” the letter stated. “The Department of Finance’s estimates must include the costs that would be incurred if the recall election is held as a special election and if it is consolidated with the next regularly scheduled election, and must include expenses for verifying signatures, printing ballots and voter information guides, and operating polling places. As required by law, the Department of Finance’s estimate of recall costs must be posted on the Secretary of State’s website and printed in the state voter information guide.”
Another report just emerged adding to the anti-Newsom firestorm that an investigation determined he radically over-exaggerated his efforts to combat California’s wildfire problem.
The report said:
An investigation from CapRadio and NPR’s California Newsroom found the governor has misrepresented his accomplishments and even disinvested in wildfire prevention. The investigation found Newsom overstated, by an astounding 690%, the number of acres treated with fuel breaks and prescribed burns in the very forestry projects he said needed to be prioritized to protect the state’s most vulnerable communities. Newsom has claimed that 35 “priority projects” carried out as a result of his executive order resulted in fire prevention work on 90,000 acres. But the state’s own data show the actual number is 11,399.
Overall, California’s response has faltered under Newsom. After an initial jump during his first year in office, data obtained by CapRadio and NPR’s California Newsroom show Cal Fire’s fuel reduction output dropped by half in 2020, to levels below Gov. Jerry Brown’s final year in office. At the same time, Newsom slashed roughly $150 million from Cal Fire’s wildfire prevention budget. In 2020, 4.3 million acres burned, the most in California’s recorded history. That was more than double the previous record, set in 2018, when the Camp Fire destroyed the town of Paradise, killing 85 people.
Author: Elizabeth Tierney
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
